Affine Grassmannian - Post 1

December 26, 2024

This is the first post in a series on a central object in the study of the geometric Langland's conjecture, the affine Grassmannian. I will be giving first properties of this object according to the lecture notes that Professor Xinwen Zhu compiled for a lecture series at the 2015 Park City Mathematics Institute (PCMI). The reader should have a good background in algebraic geometry (schemes, sheaves, stacks) and the Grassmannian.

Recall the Grassmannian Gr(r,n)\Gr(r,n) whose points correspond to the rr-dimensional subspaces of V=knV = k^n. Note also that GLn\GL_n acts transitively on the rr-dimensional subspaces of VV, so we can fix a representative WGr(k,n)W \in \Gr(k,n) of all rr-dimensional subspaces under this action. This representative is unique up to the stabilizer of the action, which we denote by P(W)P(W). For example, if k=n1k = n-1 and W=kn1W = k^{n-1} then P(W)=B=P(W) = B = upper triangular matrices, and in general GLnP(W)B\GL_n \supseteq P(W) \supseteq B. Thus, we can make the identification

Gr(r,n)=GLn/P(W)\Gr(r, n) = \GL_n/P(W)

We can consider this in the context of the classification of algebraic groups. Note that P(W)P(W) above is always a parabolic subgroup, i.e. a subgroup of GLn\GL_n containing the Borel subgroup B=B = upper triangular matrices. We can consider a generalized Grassmannian for an algebraic group GG with parabolic subgroup PP by

Gr(P,G)=G/P\Gr(P, G) = G/P

We can generalize some more to the setting of non-constant group schemes. Let GG be a reductive affine fiberwise connected non-constant kk-group scheme, which is a sheaf on affine kk-schemes. Since commutative kk-algebras are the opposite category of kk-schemes, we can consider it as a functor associating to every RR a set G(R)G(R), which we call its RR-valued points.

Let KK be a non-archimedean local field (e.g. k((t))k((t))) with ring of integers O\calo (e.g. k[[t]]k[[t]]) and residue field kk. An Iwahori subgroup of G(K)G(K) is the analogue of the Borel subgroup for an algebraic group. Roughly, it is the inverse image in G(O)G(\calo) of a Borel subgroup in G(k)G(k). Parahoric subgroups PP are then analogues of parabolic subgroups as they are finite unions of double cosets of an Iwahori subgroup. Then, by analogy, we can define the affine Grassmannian as the kk-space

GrG=G/P\Gr_G = G/P

Actually, in this specific case the affine Grassmannian is referred to in the literature as the affine flag variety of GG, and is denoted FlG\mathscr{Fl}_G.

For example, if G=GLn(K)G = \GL_n(K) then it can be shown that maximal parahoric subgroups are the stabilizers of O\calo-lattices in KnK^n. Namely, GLn(O)\GL_n(\calo) is a maximal parahoric subgroup. The Iwahori subgroups up to conjugation can be identified with the subgroup II of GLn(O)\GL_n(\calo) of matrices that reduce to an upper triangular matrix in GLn(k)\GL_n(k). Then the parahoric subgroups are all the subgroups IPGLn(O)I \subseteq P \subseteq \GL_n(\calo), which reduce injectively to parabolic subgroups of GLn(k)\GL_n(k) containing the upper-triangular matrices BB.

This actually gives another description of the affine Grassmannian GrGLn\Gr_{\GL_n} of GLn\GL_n. The motivation is to make the kk-valued points equal to k[[t]]k[[t]]-lattices in k((t))nk((t))^n.